Schwalm v. Holmes
49 Cal. 665
This text of 49 Cal. 665 (Schwalm v. Holmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schwalm v. Holmes, 49 Cal. 665 (Cal. 1875).
Opinion
The contract recited in the answer is not illegal, as being in restraint of trade. The Court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the answer.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrer to the answer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc.
470 P.3d 571 (California Supreme Court, 2020)
Centeno v. Roseville Community Hospital
107 Cal. App. 3d 62 (California Court of Appeal, 1979)
Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.
74 P.2d 745 (California Supreme Court, 1937)
J. W. Ripy & Son v. Art Wall Paper Mills
1913 OK 694 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Whitwell v. Continental Tobacco Co.
125 F. 454 (Eighth Circuit, 1903)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Burlington & Southwestern Ry. Co.
11 F. 1 (U.S. District Court, 1882)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
49 Cal. 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwalm-v-holmes-cal-1875.