Schwab v. Schachne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schwab v. Schachne

249 A.D. 657, 292 N.Y.S. 940, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5424

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 30, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 657 (Schwab v. Schachne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schwab v. Schachne, 249 A.D. 657, 292 N.Y.S. 940, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5424 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff when struck by a motor car owned by one defendant and driven by the other, and by the infant’s mother to recover for loss of services. In so far as it is in favor of plaintiff Lena Schwab, the judgment is reversed on the facts and a new trial [658]*658granted, costs to abide the event, unless within ten days from the entry of the order hereon said plaintiff stipulate to reduce to $500 the amount of the verdict rendered in her favor; in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict in favor of this plaintiff is excessive. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff when struck by a motor car owned by one defendant and driven by the other, and by the infant’s mother to recover for loss of services. In so far as it is in favor of plaintiff Lena Schwab, the judgment is reversed on the facts and a new trial [658]*658granted, costs to abide the event, unless within ten days from the entry of the order hereon said plaintiff stipulate to reduce to $500 the amount of the verdict rendered in her favor; in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict in favor of this plaintiff is excessive. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 657, 292 N.Y.S. 940, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schwab-v-schachne-nyappdiv-1936.