Schuylkill Transit Co. v. Rothensies

Third Circuit

Schuylkill Transit Co. v. Rothensies

210 F.2d 282

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 17, 1954·No. No. 11131·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit to recover for a tax payment which the taxpayer says was not properly exacted from it. It has to do with the question whether a loss was to be treated as an ordinary loss or charged as a capital loss. The district court decided the case against the taxpayer and rendered a thoroughly considered opinion in so doing, D.C.E.D.Pa. 1953, 115 F.Supp. 594. We do not have anything to add to that opinion.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit to recover for a tax payment which the taxpayer says was not properly exacted from it. It has to do with the question whether a loss was to be treated as an ordinary loss or charged as a capital loss. The district court decided the case against the taxpayer and rendered a thoroughly considered opinion in so doing, D.C.E.D.Pa. 1953, 115 F.Supp. 594. We do not have anything to add to that opinion.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Schuylkill Transit Co. v. Rothensies, 210 F.2d 282 (3d Cir. 1954).

Pincite

210 F.2d 282 (Schuylkill Transit Co. v. Rothensies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related