Schuylkill Transit Co. v. Rothensies

Third Circuit

Schuylkill Transit Co. v. Rothensies

210 F.2d 282

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 17, 1954

DocketNo. 11131

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 210 F.2d 282 (Schuylkill Transit Co. v. Rothensies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schuylkill Transit Co. v. Rothensies, 210 F.2d 282 (3d Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit to recover for a tax payment which the taxpayer says was not properly exacted from it. It has to do with the question whether a loss was to be treated as an ordinary loss or charged as a capital loss. The district court decided the case against the taxpayer and rendered a thoroughly considered opinion in so doing, D.C.E.D.Pa. 1953, 115 F.Supp. 594. We do not have anything to add to that opinion.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit to recover for a tax payment which the taxpayer says was not properly exacted from it. It has to do with the question whether a loss was to be treated as an ordinary loss or charged as a capital loss. The district court decided the case against the taxpayer and rendered a thoroughly considered opinion in so doing, D.C.E.D.Pa. 1953, 115 F.Supp. 594. We do not have anything to add to that opinion.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 F.2d 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuylkill-transit-co-v-rothensies-ca3-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack