Schuylkill Bank v. Reigart

4 Pa. 477, 1846 Pa. LEXIS 265
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 29, 1846
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 Pa. 477 (Schuylkill Bank v. Reigart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schuylkill Bank v. Reigart, 4 Pa. 477, 1846 Pa. LEXIS 265 (Pa. 1846).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The act of 1818 peremptorily requires that assignments in trust for the benefit of creditors be recorded within thirty days, in the county of the assignor’s residence ; and the act of 1836, which has done away in terms the difference that was at one time supposed to exist between . general and partial assignments, requires that a schedule or inventory of the estate or effects be filed in the same period, with the prothonotary of the same court: neither of which has been done. The-conveyance has indeed been recorded in the county where the land lies; but that is no substitute for the recording and filing required by these two statutes, the'purpose of the recording and schedule in the county of the-residence being to give information to creditors, and the purpose of recording in the'county where the land lies being to give notice to purchasers. Though reluctant to overturn a fair transaction, we are unable to overturn the decree of the court -below.

Decree affirmed.

From the 22d to the 35th, Rogers, J., was absent from indisposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Emerich
149 A. 881 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Watkins v. Wilhoit
35 P. 646 (California Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Pa. 477, 1846 Pa. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuylkill-bank-v-reigart-pa-1846.