Schutz v. Stutzer
This text of 5 Redf. 344 (Schutz v. Stutzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The will was made in April, 1875. If specie payments were not resumed, or if gold did not rise in value, as measured by the standard of United States currency, the widow would be entitled to $1,500 a year in currency, neither more nor less; but the testator had seen the wild fluctuations to which our currency had been subjected ; he understood that its purchasing power was less or greater, in proportion as the premium on gold rose or fell. He knew that $1,500 in currency, with gold at 130, was only equal to $1,375 in currency, with gold at 110; and, on the other hand, that $1,500 in currency, at par with gold, was equal to $1,650 in currency, with gold at 110.
He intended that, if the premium on gold should rise [346]*346above ten per cent., his wife should still receive the same annuity, measured by the standard of gold, as if it had remained at 110, and that, if specie payments should be resumed, when currency would necessarily be exchangeable for gold at par by the goverhment, the amount of her annuity, .measured by the same standard, should not be any greater than when gold was at 110, whether paid to her in currency or in gold. He, therefore, provided that his widow should be paid an annuity amounting to .$1,500 in currency, to be calculated at the rate of $110 in currency for each $100 in gold, or, in other words, that the amount of said annuity in. currency should remain equivalent to $1,363.64 in gold, whether the premium on gold should rise above 110, or disappear altogether. When, therefore, specie payments were resumed, and the annuity was paid to the widow in currency at par with gold, all she was entitled to receive was the sum of $1,363,64. The difference, between that amount and the sum paid to her by the executor, must be charged back to him'with interest-, and he may retain that amount from the annuity to be paid to the widow.
Decreed accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Redf. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schutz-v-stutzer-nysurct-1881.