Schutz v. Finkelstein
749 N.E.2d 204, 96 N.Y.2d 779, 725 N.Y.S.2d 634, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 645
This text of 749 N.E.2d 204 (Schutz v. Finkelstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schutz v. Finkelstein, 749 N.E.2d 204, 96 N.Y.2d 779, 725 N.Y.S.2d 634, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 645 (N.Y. 2001).
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against defendant Finkelstein, Bruckman, Wohl, Most & Rothman, and individual defendants George T. Bruckman, Jack L. Most and Bernard Rothman, dismissed as untimely (see, CPLR 5513 [b]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
749 N.E.2d 204, 96 N.Y.2d 779, 725 N.Y.S.2d 634, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schutz-v-finkelstein-ny-2001.