Schusterman v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schusterman v. Fischer

198 A.D.2d 344, 605 N.Y.S.2d 872

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 344 (Schusterman v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schusterman v. Fischer, 198 A.D.2d 344, 605 N.Y.S.2d 872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the respective interests of the parties in a corporation, the defendants David Fischer, Shipur Hashchuna Realty Corp., a/k/a Shipur Hashchuna Management Corp., a/k/a Shipur H’Shechuna Corp., Crown Realty Co., and K.Z.H.B. Associates appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Yoswein, J.), dated May 13, 1993, as denied their cross motion to disqualify counsel for the plaintiffs.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In accordance with our determination in the companion case entitled Fischer v Deitsch (198 AD2d 327 [decided here[345]*345with]), we find that the Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ cross motion to disqualify Israel Weinstock as counsel for the plaintiffs. Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Miller and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the respective interests of the parties in a corporation, the defendants David Fischer, Shipur Hashchuna Realty Corp., a/k/a Shipur Hashchuna Management Corp., a/k/a Shipur H’Shechuna Corp., Crown Realty Co., and K.Z.H.B. Associates appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Yoswein, J.), dated May 13, 1993, as denied their cross motion to disqualify counsel for the plaintiffs.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In accordance with our determination in the companion case entitled Fischer v Deitsch (198 AD2d 327 [decided here[345]*345with]), we find that the Supreme Court properly denied the appellants’ cross motion to disqualify Israel Weinstock as counsel for the plaintiffs. Thompson, J. P., Balletta, Miller and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 344, 605 N.Y.S.2d 872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schusterman-v-fischer-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack