Schuster v. State
This text of 450 S.W.2d 616 (Schuster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The conviction is for violation of Article 476, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., 1 with punishment assessed at a fine of $200.00.
In her sole ground of error appellant challenges the constitutionality of Article 476, supra.
In Alobaidi v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 433 S.W.2d 440, this Court in an opinion by Presiding Judge Woodley upheld the constitutionality of said statute. We adhere to that decision. See also LeBlanc v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 441 S.W.2d 847. As we view it, such statute is not violative of the First Amendment, United States Constitution or Article I, Sec. 8, Texas Constitution, Vernon’s Ann.St.
The judgment is affirmed.
. The complaint and information were drawn under the portion of the statute which provides:
“Whoever * * * uses any telephone in any manner with intent to harass, annoy, torment, abuse, threaten or intimidate another, except if such call be for a lawful business purpose, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be fined not less than One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) nor more than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment in the county jail for not less than one (1) month nor more than twelve (12) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
450 S.W.2d 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuster-v-state-texcrimapp-1970.