Schuster v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Schuster v. State

551 S.W.2d 210, 261 Ark. 730, 1977 Ark. LEXIS 2142

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 31, 1977

DocketCR 77-86

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 551 S.W.2d 210 (Schuster v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schuster v. State, 551 S.W.2d 210, 261 Ark. 730, 1977 Ark. LEXIS 2142 (Ark. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner was convicted of aggravated robbery in the Circuit Court of Crawford County and sentenced to 15 years in prison and fined 110,000.00. Notice of appeal was filed by petitioner’s employed trial counsel on June 21, 1976. It appears that this attorney did not perfect the appeal because he received a letter from petitioner stating that appellant did not want to appeal this conviction. Petitioner in requesting that a belated appeal be allowed, contends that this waiver of his right to appeal was not voluntary because of the prosecuting attorney’s threats to prosecute him on other charges, if he did appeal. The employed trial counsel has not been given permission by this court to withdraw. See Rule 36.26, Rules of Criminal Procedure; Rule 11 (h), Rules of the Supreme Court. Appeal has not been dismissed, in this court, in spite of the fact that notice of appeal was given. See Rule 36.20, 36.23, Rules of Criminal Procedure; Norfleet v. Norfleet, 223 Ark. 751, 268 S.W. 2d 387; Sate v. Adkisson, 251 Ark. 119, 471 S.W. 2d 332. We can not ascertain whether the appeal was ever dismissed in the trial court.

Although we can grant a belated appeal, where notice was given, and the transcript record never filed here under Rule 36.9, Rules of Criminal Procedure, there are important questions of fact to be determined before we can say that there was good reason for the failure of appellant or his attorney to file the record here, and these questions can not be resolved on affidavits.

Petitioner’s request for a belated appeal is denied without prejudice to his applying to the trial court for a hearing on the question of whether his right to appeal was voluntarily waived, and if not, for an order for the filing of a transcript of the record in this court, and without prejudice to his right to appeal to this court from any ruling adverse to him.

Byrd, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner was convicted of aggravated robbery in the Circuit Court of Crawford County and sentenced to 15 years in prison and fined 110,000.00. Notice of appeal was filed by petitioner’s employed trial counsel on June 21, 1976. It appears that this attorney did not perfect the appeal because he received a letter from petitioner stating that appellant did not want to appeal this conviction. Petitioner in requesting that a belated appeal be allowed, contends that this waiver of his right to appeal was not voluntary because of the prosecuting attorney’s threats to prosecute him on other charges, if he did appeal. The employed trial counsel has not been given permission by this court to withdraw. See Rule 36.26, Rules of Criminal Procedure; Rule 11 (h), Rules of the Supreme Court. Appeal has not been dismissed, in this court, in spite of the fact that notice of appeal was given. See Rule 36.20, 36.23, Rules of Criminal Procedure; Norfleet v. Norfleet, 223 Ark. 751, 268 S.W. 2d 387; Sate v. Adkisson, 251 Ark. 119, 471 S.W. 2d 332. We can not ascertain whether the appeal was ever dismissed in the trial court.

Although we can grant a belated appeal, where notice was given, and the transcript record never filed here under Rule 36.9, Rules of Criminal Procedure, there are important questions of fact to be determined before we can say that there was good reason for the failure of appellant or his attorney to file the record here, and these questions can not be resolved on affidavits.

Petitioner’s request for a belated appeal is denied without prejudice to his applying to the trial court for a hearing on the question of whether his right to appeal was voluntarily waived, and if not, for an order for the filing of a transcript of the record in this court, and without prejudice to his right to appeal to this court from any ruling adverse to him.

Byrd, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

551 S.W.2d 210, 261 Ark. 730, 1977 Ark. LEXIS 2142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuster-v-state-ark-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack