Schuster v. General Motors Corp.

672 So. 2d 106, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4299, 1996 WL 194367
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 1996·No. No. 95-1600·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Kramer v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 520 So.2d 37 (Fla.1988); Affiliates for Evaluation & Therapy, Inc. v. Viasyn Corp., 500 So.2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); GAF Corp. v. Zack Co., 445 So.2d 350 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), review denied, 453 So.2d 45 (Fla.1984); Ortega v. General Motors Corp., 392 So.2d 40 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schuster v. General Motors Corp., 672 So. 2d 106, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4299, 1996 WL 194367 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

672 So. 2d 106 (Schuster v. General Motors Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ortega v. General Motors Corp.
392 So. 2d 40 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
GAF Corp. v. Zack Co.
445 So. 2d 350 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Affiliates for Evaluation v. Viasyn Corp.
500 So. 2d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Kramer v. Piper Aircraft Corp.
520 So. 2d 37 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)