Schuster Naval Stores Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Schuster Naval Stores Co. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 997, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2867

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 13, 1968

DocketNo. P68/58; protests 62/9334 and 64/11189 (Tampa)

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 997 (Schuster Naval Stores Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schuster Naval Stores Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 997, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2867 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of galvanized wire fencing, composed of wires not over twenty one-hundredths and not [998]*998under eight one-hundredths of one inch in diameter, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al. v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of galvanized wire fencing, composed of wires not over twenty one-hundredths and not [998]*998under eight one-hundredths of one inch in diameter, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al. v. United States (52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Cust. Ct. 997, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuster-naval-stores-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack