Schussel v. New York City Transit Authority
This text of 417 N.E.2d 569 (Schussel v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
There was no error of law in the unanimous determination of that court that all 22 causes of action set forth in the complaint should be dismissed. Nor was it an abuse of discretion to deny appellants leave to replead with respect to the claims alleged in the first four causes of action.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 N.E.2d 569, 52 N.Y.2d 729, 436 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schussel-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-ny-1980.