Schurzer v. State

30 S.W. 221, 34 Tex. Crim. 276, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 76
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 26, 1895
DocketNo. 734.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 S.W. 221 (Schurzer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schurzer v. State, 30 S.W. 221, 34 Tex. Crim. 276, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 76 (Tex. 1895).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of selling beer to a ■ minor. The evidence fally supports the verdict. It is positively sworn, *277 that the minor purchased the beer from appellant, and that he knew the purchaser was a minor. Appellant testified he did not sell the beer as charged. He is corroborated by another witness in a general way. The jury credited the State’s testimony, and found against appellant. There was no exception reserved to the court’s ruling excluding certain testimony set forth in the motion for new trial. As presented, this supposed error will not be revised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Judges all present and concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ward v. State
159 S.W. 272 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 S.W. 221, 34 Tex. Crim. 276, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schurzer-v-state-texcrimapp-1895.