Schurtz v. Kelley
78 N.W. 332, 119 Mich. 383, 1899 Mich. LEXIS 802
This text of 78 N.W. 332 (Schurtz v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schurtz v. Kelley, 78 N.W. 332, 119 Mich. 383, 1899 Mich. LEXIS 802 (Mich. 1899).
Opinion
This case originated in justice’s court. In the circuit court, defendants moved a continuance, which was refused.' Both parties noticed the case for trial. The motion was not made till the second week of the term, and no excuse was shown for delay in making the motion the first day of term, under Cir. Ct. Rule No. 22.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Haxer v. Griessel
127 N.W. 309 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)
Geddis v. Wayne Circuit Judge
114 N.W. 874 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
78 N.W. 332, 119 Mich. 383, 1899 Mich. LEXIS 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schurtz-v-kelley-mich-1899.