Schurtz v. Kelley
78 N.W. 332, 119 Mich. 383, 1899 Mich. LEXIS 802
Opinion
This case originated in justice’s court. In the circuit court, defendants moved a continuance, which was refused.' Both parties noticed the case for trial. The motion was not made till the second week of the term, and no excuse was shown for delay in making the motion the first day of term, under Cir. Ct. Rule No. 22.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schurtz v. Kelley, 78 N.W. 332, 119 Mich. 383, 1899 Mich. LEXIS 802 (Mich. 1899).
78 N.W. 332 (Schurtz v. Kelley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haxer v. Griessel
127 N.W. 309 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)
Geddis v. Wayne Circuit Judge
114 N.W. 874 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1908)