Schurman v. Tate, State of Florida
This text of Schurman v. Tate, State of Florida (Schurman v. Tate, State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-2850 _____________________________
CHRISTOPHER M. SCHURMAN,
Appellant,
v.
JOHN TATE, Holmes County Sheriff, STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellees. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Holmes County. Russell S. Roberts, Judge.
May 8, 2024
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED as moot.
ROBERTS, RAY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Christopher M. Schurman, pro se, Appellant. David F. Holmes, Slocomb, Alabama, for Appellee John Tate, Holmes County Sheriff; Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee State of Florida.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Schurman v. Tate, State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schurman-v-tate-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.