Schurck v. Nutter

City of New York Municipal Court

Schurck v. Nutter

32 Misc. 774, 66 N.Y.S. 1144

DecidedOctober 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 774 (Schurck v. Nutter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schurck v. Nutter, 32 Misc. 774, 66 N.Y.S. 1144 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Hascall, J.

It seems to us, from the testimony adduced upon the trial, that respondent sustained the allegations of his complaint, by the necessary weight of evidence, which enabled the jury to say that the appellant promised or agreed to pay the commission sued for, of was cognizant of effort being made in her behalf for which, if successful, she would be obliged to pay the customary rate. We also find that the question was fairly submitted below.

Judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hascall, J.

It seems to us, from the testimony adduced upon the trial, that respondent sustained the allegations of his complaint, by the necessary weight of evidence, which enabled the jury to say that the appellant promised or agreed to pay the commission sued for, of was cognizant of effort being made in her behalf for which, if successful, she would be obliged to pay the customary rate. We also find that the question was fairly submitted below.

Judgment and order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimons, Ch. J., concurs.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Misc. 774, 66 N.Y.S. 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schurck-v-nutter-nynyccityct-1900.