Schundler v. Donovan

874 A.2d 506, 183 N.J. 383, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 501
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 6, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 874 A.2d 506 (Schundler v. Donovan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schundler v. Donovan, 874 A.2d 506, 183 N.J. 383, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 501 (N.J. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division in the opinion of Judge Kestin reported at 377 N.J.Super. 339, 872 A.2d 1092 (2005).

We add only the following.

The Appellate Division suggested several possibilities to achieve the results it ordered, including altered type face and ballot reorganization. We note that N.J.S.A. 19:23-26.1 specifically contemplates such a flexible approach insofar as it provides that “in the case of a primary election for the nomination of a candidate for the office of Governor, the names of all candidates for the office of ... Governor shall be printed on the official primary ballot in the first column or horizontal row designated for the party of those candidates.” (emphasis added). Accord N.J.S.A. 19:49-2.

The question has been raised whether the decision of the Appellate Division applies to all twenty-one counties. We hold that it does.

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE, and RIVERA-SOTO-~6.

Opposed — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Andy Kim v. Christine Hanlon
99 F.4th 140 (Third Circuit, 2024)
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
874 A.2d 506, 183 N.J. 383, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schundler-v-donovan-nj-2005.