Schundler v. Donovan
This text of 874 A.2d 506 (Schundler v. Donovan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division in the opinion of Judge Kestin reported at 377 N.J.Super. 339, 872 A.2d 1092 (2005).
We add only the following.
The Appellate Division suggested several possibilities to achieve the results it ordered, including altered type face and ballot reorganization. We note that N.J.S.A. 19:23-26.1 specifically contemplates such a flexible approach insofar as it provides that “in the case of a primary election for the nomination of a candidate for the office of Governor, the names of all candidates for the office of ... Governor shall be printed on the official primary ballot in the first column or horizontal row designated for the party of those candidates.” (emphasis added). Accord N.J.S.A. 19:49-2.
The question has been raised whether the decision of the Appellate Division applies to all twenty-one counties. We hold that it does.
For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE, and RIVERA-SOTO-~6.
Opposed — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
874 A.2d 506, 183 N.J. 383, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schundler-v-donovan-nj-2005.