Schumer v. Kohn

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Schumer v. Kohn

111 N.Y.S. 728

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 111 N.Y.S. 728 (Schumer v. Kohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schumer v. Kohn, 111 N.Y.S. 728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

MacLEAN, J.

The defendant Pototzky appeals from an interlocutory judgment overruling his demurrer to the amended complaint herein. While an appeal" from an order upon a demurrer may not be taken, “the proper practice is to enter an order overruling the demurrer, this to be followed by the entry of an interlocutory judgment, from which an appeal would be.” Binder v. Robinson (April Term, 1908) 110 N. Y. Supp. 229.

The judgment herein must be affirmed, as the Municipal Court has jurisdiction to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, limited, it is true, and different from that which prevails in a court of record (Eadie v. Waldron, 64 App. Div. 424, 72 N. Y. Supp. 233; Drall v. Gordon, 51 Misc. Rep. 618, 101 N. Y. Supp. 171), and the complaint discloses compliance with section 3404 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent, but with leave to the defendant to answer upon compliance with the terms imposed by said interlocutory judgment. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacLEAN, J.

The defendant Pototzky appeals from an interlocutory judgment overruling his demurrer to the amended complaint herein. While an appeal" from an order upon a demurrer may not be taken, “the proper practice is to enter an order overruling the demurrer, this to be followed by the entry of an interlocutory judgment, from which an appeal would be.” Binder v. Robinson (April Term, 1908) 110 N. Y. Supp. 229.

The judgment herein must be affirmed, as the Municipal Court has jurisdiction to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, limited, it is true, and different from that which prevails in a court of record (Eadie v. Waldron, 64 App. Div. 424, 72 N. Y. Supp. 233; Drall v. Gordon, 51 Misc. Rep. 618, 101 N. Y. Supp. 171), and the complaint discloses compliance with section 3404 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent, but with leave to the defendant to answer upon compliance with the terms imposed by said interlocutory judgment. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 N.Y.S. 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schumer-v-kohn-nyappterm-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack