Schumer v. Burtan

208 A.D.2d 823, 618 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10075
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 24, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated February 9, 1993, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

[824]*824Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants. The defendants presented prima facie evidence of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, and the plaintiff failed to present any evidence in admissible form to establish the existence of a material issue of fact (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 560). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schumer v. Burtan, 208 A.D.2d 823, 618 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10075 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

208 A.D.2d 823 (Schumer v. Burtan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Staten Theatre Group
245 A.D.2d 440 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Dombrowski v. County of Nassau
230 A.D.2d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Marigin v. City of New York
215 A.D.2d 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)