Schuman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schuman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

198 So. 3d 1160, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13487, 2016 WL 4708563

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 8, 2016

DocketNo. 1D15-0804

StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 3d 1160 (Schuman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schuman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 198 So. 3d 1160, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13487, 2016 WL 4708563 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Katherine Schuman, raises three issues in this appeal from a final judgment of foreclosure. In her third issue, she argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion for involuntary dismissal. We disagree and affirm this issue. With regard to the two remaining issues, the appellee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., concedes that the appellant was denied the opportunity to fully and fairly present her case to the trial court. This concession is well taken, and therefore, the Judgment of Foreclosure is REVERSED, and this action is REMANDED for a new trial.

ROBERTS, C.J., OSTERHAUS and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Katherine Schuman, raises three issues in this appeal from a final judgment of foreclosure. In her third issue, she argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion for involuntary dismissal. We disagree and affirm this issue. With regard to the two remaining issues, the appellee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., concedes that the appellant was denied the opportunity to fully and fairly present her case to the trial court. This concession is well taken, and therefore, the Judgment of Foreclosure is REVERSED, and this action is REMANDED for a new trial.

ROBERTS, C.J., OSTERHAUS and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 So. 3d 1160, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13487, 2016 WL 4708563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schuman-v-wells-fargo-bank-na-fladistctapp-2016.