Schuman v. State

927 So. 2d 972, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4430, 2006 WL 782711
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 29, 2006·No. No. 4D04-3357·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We note that Appellant’s issue concerning double jeopardy is mooted by the subsequent amendment of the judgment. Merging counts VII and VIII into counts I and II effectively vacated counts VII and VIII.

STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schuman v. State, 927 So. 2d 972, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4430, 2006 WL 782711 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

927 So. 2d 972 (Schuman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.