Schumacher v. One Stop Lawn & Garden Center

522 So. 2d 1076, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1396, 1988 WL 31742
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 13, 1988
DocketNo. 87-0754
StatusPublished

This text of 522 So. 2d 1076 (Schumacher v. One Stop Lawn & Garden Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schumacher v. One Stop Lawn & Garden Center, 522 So. 2d 1076, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1396, 1988 WL 31742 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is insufficient evidence, based on an examination of the record, to support a judgment against the individual defendant. Therefore, the final judgment as to the defendant G. James Schumacher is reversed. We remand for entry of a judgment in his favor directing that the individual defendant go hence without day.

ANSTEAD, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 So. 2d 1076, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1396, 1988 WL 31742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schumacher-v-one-stop-lawn-garden-center-fladistctapp-1988.