Schumacher v. Manhattan Life Ins.

21 F. Cas. 755

This text of 21 F. Cas. 755 (Schumacher v. Manhattan Life Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schumacher v. Manhattan Life Ins., 21 F. Cas. 755 (circtedmo 1874).

Opinion

Upon these facts THE COURT

(DILLON, Circuit Judge)

instructed the jury that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover: (1) Because there never was any demand for a paid-up policy, or offer to surrender the policy sued; (2) because, after the premium was due, May 16, 1871, and when on November 3, 1871, payment was tendered, no health certificate was tendered, nor was any such certificate tendered at any time previous to the death of the assured; and (3) because when, subsequent to said November 3d, a proposition was made to renew on condition that the assured should make a new application and pass a satisfactory medical examination and pay said premium, he failed to comply with any of said conditions.

Upon the giving of this instruction the plaintiff submitted to a nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 F. Cas. 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schumacher-v-manhattan-life-ins-circtedmo-1874.