Schumacher v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schumacher v. Mahoney

123 A.D.2d 519, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60278

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 26, 1986·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly validated petitioner’s designating petition. The information petitioner deleted was merely repetitive of information already printed on the petition form. The record contains no evidence of fraudulent practices, confusion or threats to the integrity of the electoral system (Matter of Fromson v Lefever, 112 AD2d 1064). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, J.—Election Law.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Law-ton, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 21, 1986.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly validated petitioner’s designating petition. The information petitioner deleted was merely repetitive of information already printed on the petition form. The record contains no evidence of fraudulent practices, confusion or threats to the integrity of the electoral system (Matter of Fromson v Lefever, 112 AD2d 1064). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolf, J.—Election Law.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Law-ton, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 21, 1986.)

Schumacher v. Mahoney, 123 A.D.2d 519, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60278 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

123 A.D.2d 519 (Schumacher v. Mahoney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related