Schumacher v. Kreiner

709 N.E.2d 172, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1370
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 28, 1999
Docket99-245
StatusPublished

This text of 709 N.E.2d 172 (Schumacher v. Kreiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schumacher v. Kreiner, 709 N.E.2d 172, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1370 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-980188. On discretionary appeal. Appeal allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

On motion for admission pro hac vice. Motion denied for failure to comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. I(2)(B).

Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
709 N.E.2d 172, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1467, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schumacher-v-kreiner-ohio-1999.