Schumacher v. King's Hamburger, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Schumacher v. King's Hamburger, Inc.

173 Misc. 238, 17 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1428

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 5, 1940

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 Misc. 238 (Schumacher v. King's Hamburger, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schumacher v. King's Hamburger, Inc., 173 Misc. 238, 17 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1428 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Although the Municipal Court had no jurisdiction to enforce the attorney’s hen against the third party defendant (Matter of Gordon, 173 N. Y. Supp. 426) it had power to vacate the satisfaction of the judgment. (Duringshoff v. Coates & Co., 93 Misc. 485.)

Order modified by striking out so much thereof as determines the amount of the attorney’s lien and dismissing proceeding to enforce lien, without prejudice, and, as modified, affirmed.

All concur. Present — McCook, Hammer and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Although the Municipal Court had no jurisdiction to enforce the attorney’s hen against the third party defendant (Matter of Gordon, 173 N. Y. Supp. 426) it had power to vacate the satisfaction of the judgment. (Duringshoff v. Coates & Co., 93 Misc. 485.)

Order modified by striking out so much thereof as determines the amount of the attorney’s lien and dismissing proceeding to enforce lien, without prejudice, and, as modified, affirmed.

All concur. Present — McCook, Hammer and Shientag, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 Misc. 238, 17 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schumacher-v-kings-hamburger-inc-nyappterm-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack