Schulze v. Kijakazi

N.D. Illinois

Schulze v. Kijakazi

DecidedMarch 6, 2023

Docket3:21-cv-50378

StatusUnknown

This text of Schulze v. Kijakazi (Schulze v. Kijakazi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schulze v. Kijakazi, (N.D. Ill. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION Herbert S., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 21 CV 50378 Vv. ) ) Hon. Jain D. Johnston ) Kilolo Kyakazi, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Judge Jensen’s Report and Recommendation that the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment be granted, the defendant’s be denied, and the ALJ’s decision be reversed and the case be remanded. Dkt. 24. Judge Jensen gave until 2/21/2023 for any objection, but none was filed. This Court finds Judge Jensen’s Report and Recommendation [24] to be well-reasoned, finds no clear error, and therefore accepts it. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) ("If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error."). Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted, the government’s is denied, and this case is remanded for proceedings consistent with Judge Jensen’s Report and Recommendation. Civil case terminated.

Date: March 6, 2023 SX SS Tain D. Johnston United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS WESTERN DIVISION Herbert S., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 21 CV 50378 Vv. ) ) Hon. Jain D. Johnston ) Kilolo Kyakazi, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Judge Jensen’s Report and Recommendation that the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment be granted, the defendant’s be denied, and the ALJ’s decision be reversed and the case be remanded. Dkt. 24. Judge Jensen gave until 2/21/2023 for any objection, but none was filed. This Court finds Judge Jensen’s Report and Recommendation [24] to be well-reasoned, finds no clear error, and therefore accepts it. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) ("If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error."). Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted, the government’s is denied, and this case is remanded for proceedings consistent with Judge Jensen’s Report and Recommendation. Civil case terminated.

Date: March 6, 2023 SX SS Tain D. Johnston United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Schulze v. Kijakazi, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulze-v-kijakazi-ilnd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack