Schulze v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schulze v. Division of Employment Security

413 S.W.3d 34, 2013 WL 5797674, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1289

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 29, 2013·No. No. WD 75715·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The employment of Appellant Robin Schulze with Home Performance Services, LLC terminated on May 10, 2012. Schul-ze applied for unemployment benefits. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denied her claim, finding that she voluntarily left work without good cause attributable to the work or her employer. Schulze appeals, arguing that the Commission’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The employment of Appellant Robin Schulze with Home Performance Services, LLC terminated on May 10, 2012. Schul-ze applied for unemployment benefits. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denied her claim, finding that she voluntarily left work without good cause attributable to the work or her employer. Schulze appeals, arguing that the Commission’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Schulze v. Division of Employment Security, 413 S.W.3d 34, 2013 WL 5797674, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1289 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

413 S.W.3d 34 (Schulze v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.