Schulz v. Town Board

209 A.D.2d 1047, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1007

This text of 209 A.D.2d 1047 (Schulz v. Town Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schulz v. Town Board, 209 A.D.2d 1047, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1007 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this combined declaratory judgment action and CPLR article 78 proceeding, Supreme Court erred in dismissing that portion of the complaint seeking declaratory relief (see, Tumminello v Tumminello, 204 [1048]*1048AD2d 1067). Thus, we modify the judgment by reinstating the complaint and by granting judgment declaring that the health insurance programs of the Town of Caneadea do not violate NY Constitution, article VII, § 8, or article VIII, § 1. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Allegany County, Francis, J.—Declaratory Judgment.) Present—Balio, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Wesley and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tumminello v. Tumminello
204 A.D.2d 1067 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D.2d 1047, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulz-v-town-board-nyappdiv-1994.