Schulz v. Rush-Henrietta Central School District

222 A.D.2d 1015, 635 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14055
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: At the outset, we note that petitioner Katherine G. Wheat is deceased. Inasmuch as the relief sought was a judgment vindicating her right to vote on school budgets, her interest does not survive her death and substitution is not required (see, CPLR 1015 [b]).

Supreme Court properly dismissed this proceeding. We affirm but for a different reason. Petitioner Robert L. Schulz lacks standing to prosecute this proceeding under State Finance Law § 123-b (see, Matter of Schulz v Cobleskill-Richmondville Cent. School Dist. Bd. of Educ., 197 AD2d 247, 251) and General Municipal Law § 51 (see, Schnepel v Board of Educ., 302 NY 94, 96). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, [1016] Monroe County, Rosenbloom, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schulz v. Rush-Henrietta Central School District, 222 A.D.2d 1015, 635 N.Y.S.2d 903, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14055 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 1015 (Schulz v. Rush-Henrietta Central School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burns v. Town of Clarkstown
255 A.D.2d 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)