Schulz v. Rohe

The Superior Court of New York City

Schulz v. Rohe

8 Misc. 683, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 892

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedMay 15, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Misc. 683 (Schulz v. Rohe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schulz v. Rohe, 8 Misc. 683, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 892 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the decision of the General Term of this court upon the former appeal (4 Misc. Rep. 384) and the evidence given by both parties upon the trial now under review, the case was one for the jury. It was properly submitted and, upon the whole case, it cannot be held that the verdict is contrary to evidence or to the weight of the evidence. No reason appears sufficient to call for a disturbance of the verdict. There were no errors in the admission or exclusion of evidence.

The judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Freedman and McAdam, JJ.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI