Schulz, Thomas Alvin v. State
This text of Schulz, Thomas Alvin v. State (Schulz, Thomas Alvin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Modified as Affirm and Opinion Filed July 12, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00287-CR No. 05-12-00288-CR
THOMAS ALVIN SCHULZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-00500-J, F11-00343-J
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Evans Opinion by Justice Bridges
Thomas Alvin Schulz waived a jury and pleaded guilty to credit card abuse and theft of
property from an elderly person valued at $500. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.03(a), (e)(3),
(f)(3)(A), 32.31(b), (d) (West 2011 & Supp. 2012). Pursuant to plea agreements, the trial court
deferred adjudicating guilt, placed appellant on five years’ community supervision, and assessed
a $1,000 fine and $85,506.22 in restitution in each case. In his sole issue on appeal, appellant
challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support the amount of restitution ordered. In our
opinion of September 19, 2012, we sustained appellant’s issue, set aside the trial court’s restitution orders, and ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the proper amount
of restitution.
On February 21, 2013, we reinstated the appeals and adopted the trial court’s findings
that the parties reached an agreement regarding the amount of restitution. We have received
supplemental records containing the amended community supervision condition that orders
appellant to pay $45,000 in restitution. Accordingly, we modify the trial court’s judgments to
reflect the restitution amount is $45,000 in each case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v.
State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30
(Tex. App.─Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d).
As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.
Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47 120287F.U05
/David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
‐2‐ Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
THOMAS ALVIN SCHULZ, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-12-00287-CR V. F10-00500-J). Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and Evans participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of deferred adjudication is MODIFIED as follows:
The section entitled “Restitution” is modified to show “$45,000.”
As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s order of deferred adjudication.
Judgment entered July 12, 2013
‐3‐ Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
THOMAS ALVIN SCHULZ, Appellant Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. No. 05-12-00288-CR V. F11-00343-J). Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Francis and Evans participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order of deferred adjudication is MODIFIED as follows:
The section entitled “Restitution” is modified to show “$45,000.”
As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s order of deferred adjudication.
‐4‐
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Schulz, Thomas Alvin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulz-thomas-alvin-v-state-texapp-2013.