Schultze v. Hudson Counties Title & Mortgage Co.
238 A.D. 881, 263 N.Y.S. 999
Opinion
Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss complaint reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the alleged agreement is unenforcible because not in writing. (Real Prop. Law, § 259; Palmer v. Rotary Realty Co., 178 App. Div. 907; Riker v. Comfort, 140 id. 117.) All concur, except Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., who dissent and vote to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schultze v. Hudson Counties Title & Mortgage Co., 238 A.D. 881, 263 N.Y.S. 999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
238 A.D. 881 (Schultze v. Hudson Counties Title & Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palmer v. Rotary Realty Co.
178 A.D. 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)