Schultze v. Hudson Counties Title & Mortgage Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schultze v. Hudson Counties Title & Mortgage Co.

238 A.D. 881, 263 N.Y.S. 999

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D. 881 (Schultze v. Hudson Counties Title & Mortgage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schultze v. Hudson Counties Title & Mortgage Co., 238 A.D. 881, 263 N.Y.S. 999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss complaint reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the alleged agreement is unenforcible because not in writing. (Real Prop. Law, § 259; Palmer v. Rotary Realty Co., 178 App. Div. 907; Riker v. Comfort, 140 id. 117.) All concur, except Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., who dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss complaint reversed, on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the alleged agreement is unenforcible because not in writing. (Real Prop. Law, § 259; Palmer v. Rotary Realty Co., 178 App. Div. 907; Riker v. Comfort, 140 id. 117.) All concur, except Rhodes and Crapser, JJ., who dissent and vote to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D. 881, 263 N.Y.S. 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultze-v-hudson-counties-title-mortgage-co-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack