Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Schultz v. Van Doren

Schultz v. Van Doren

55 A. 1133, 65 N.J. Eq. 764, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 304
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedAugust 25, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 55 A. 1133 (Schultz v. Van Doren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schultz v. Van Doren, 55 A. 1133, 65 N.J. Eq. 764, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 304 (N.J. 1903).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, filed in the court of chancery, and reported in 19 Dick. Ch. Rep. 465.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voori-iees, Vroom, Green- — 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A. 1133, 65 N.J. Eq. 764, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-v-van-doren-nj-1903.