Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Schultz v. Van Doren

Schultz v. Van Doren

55 A. 1133, 65 N.J. Eq. 764, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 304
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided August 25, 1903·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, filed in the court of chancery, and reported in 19 Dick. Ch. Rep. 465.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voori-iees, Vroom, Green- — 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schultz v. Van Doren, 55 A. 1133, 65 N.J. Eq. 764, 1903 N.J. LEXIS 304 (N.J. 1903).

55 A. 1133 (Schultz v. Van Doren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.