Schultz v. Unit Distribution of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Schultz v. Unit Distribution of Missouri

854 S.W.2d 858, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 885, 1993 WL 199133

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 15, 1993·No. No. 62770·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee appeals the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying his workers’ compensation claim. We find sufficient competent evidence to warrant the Commission’s denial and affirm. § 287.495, RSMo Supp.1992.

We also determine an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value. Rule [859]*85984.16(b). A memorandum has been provided for the parties’ use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employee appeals the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying his workers’ compensation claim. We find sufficient competent evidence to warrant the Commission’s denial and affirm. § 287.495, RSMo Supp.1992.

We also determine an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value. Rule [859]*85984.16(b). A memorandum has been provided for the parties’ use only.

Schultz v. Unit Distribution of Missouri, 854 S.W.2d 858, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 885, 1993 WL 199133 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

854 S.W.2d 858 (Schultz v. Unit Distribution of Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.