Schultz v. Pollock

144 A. 920, 104 N.J. Eq. 205, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 508
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 4, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church, and reported in 102 N.J. Eq. 157.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None. *Page 206

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schultz v. Pollock, 144 A. 920, 104 N.J. Eq. 205, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 508 (N.J. 1929).

144 A. 920 (Schultz v. Pollock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sunset Beach Amusement Corp. v. Belk
158 A.2d 35 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)