Schultz v. Pollock
144 A. 920, 104 N.J. Eq. 205, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 508
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church, and reported in
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None. *Page 206
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schultz v. Pollock, 144 A. 920, 104 N.J. Eq. 205, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 508 (N.J. 1929).
144 A. 920 (Schultz v. Pollock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sunset Beach Amusement Corp. v. Belk
158 A.2d 35 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960)