Schultz v. Obama

564 F. App'x 604

• Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
• Decided: May 9, 2014
• Docket: No. 13-5378
• Status: Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order dismissing appellant’s complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(l)(B)(i) be affirmed. The district court correctly characterized appellant’s factual contentions as “clearly baseless.” Neitzke v. Williams 490 U.S. 319, 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.