Schultz v. MacHovec Food Market

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Schultz v. MacHovec Food Market

358 N.W.2d 155, 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3810

CourtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 20, 1984

DocketC1-84-1280

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 358 N.W.2d 155 (Schultz v. MacHovec Food Market) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schultz v. MacHovec Food Market, 358 N.W.2d 155, 1984 Minn. App. LEXIS 3810 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

FACTS

Respondent Donald Schultz was employed by relator Machovec Food Market as a driver until he was allegedly terminated from his employment on January 17, 1984. Relator alleges respondent quit. The Commissioner of Economic Security determined that the discharge was involun *156 tary and for reasons other than misconduct. Relator requests a remand of the case to the appeal tribunal for taking of further evidence.

DECISION

Substantial evidence in the record of the hearing before the department referee supports the Commissioner’s determination. White v. Metropolitan Medical Center, 332 N.W.2d 25, 27 (Minn.1983). The Commissioner did not err by refusing to remand the matter for additional testimony solely because relator was not represented by counsel and did not present all the testimony it now feels would be helpful.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI