Schultz v. Lepage
This text of 21 Ill. 160 (Schultz v. Lepage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence in this case fully establishes the trespass complained of by Lepage. The facts stated by Lon-good, the principal witness, show, most conclusively, that these hogs, the property of Lepage, were killed by Schultz and converted to his own use, and that their value was twenty-two dollars. This leaves any inquiry about the sow, worried by the dogs, for which Schultz tendered three dollars as amends, unnecessary.
As to the instruction asked for by the defendant, it was properly refused, because the plaintiff’s claim for three hogs, besides the sow, was fully made out by the proof. The value of the sow was not included in it, for the three hogs the witness saw butchered, were worth, two of them, seven dollars each, and one, eight dollars; making the amount found by the jury.
It is immaterial, as this court has frequently decided, that improper evidence has been admitted, so that they find sufficient legal evidence in the record to sustain the verdict. This we find in this case, and accordingly affirm the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Ill. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-v-lepage-ill-1859.