Schultz v. HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS
711 N.W.2d 304, 474 Mich. 1066
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schultz v. HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS. Read the opinion of the Court — 474 Mich. 948 →
Opinion
Nellie SCHULTZ and James Schultz, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS, d/b/a Riverside Osteopathic Hospital, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of December 8, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
KELLY, J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schultz v. HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS, 711 N.W.2d 304, 474 Mich. 1066 (Mich. 2006).
711 N.W.2d 304 (Schultz v. HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.