Schultz v. HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS
711 N.W.2d 304, 474 Mich. 1066
This text of 711 N.W.2d 304 (Schultz v. HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schultz v. HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS, 711 N.W.2d 304, 474 Mich. 1066 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Nellie SCHULTZ and James Schultz, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEMS, d/b/a Riverside Osteopathic Hospital, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of December 8, 2005 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
KELLY, J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
711 N.W.2d 304, 474 Mich. 1066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-v-henry-ford-health-systems-mich-2006.