Schultz v. Frisby

Seventh Circuit

Schultz v. Frisby

822 F.2d 642, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18319

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedApril 30, 1987

DocketNo. 85-2950

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 822 F.2d 642 (Schultz v. Frisby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schultz v. Frisby, 822 F.2d 642, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18319 (7th Cir. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On April 6, 1987, this Court ordered that the panel opinion reported at 807 F.2d 1339 (1986) be vacated and that the case be reheard en banc. After rehearing this case en banc, this Court, by an equally divided vote, affirms the judgment of the district court, 619 F.Supp. 792, granting the plaintiffs’ request for a temporary injunction. The case is returned to the district court for any further proceedings deemed necessary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On April 6, 1987, this Court ordered that the panel opinion reported at 807 F.2d 1339 (1986) be vacated and that the case be reheard en banc. After rehearing this case en banc, this Court, by an equally divided vote, affirms the judgment of the district court, 619 F.Supp. 792, granting the plaintiffs’ request for a temporary injunction. The case is returned to the district court for any further proceedings deemed necessary.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

822 F.2d 642, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 18319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-v-frisby-ca7-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack