Schultz v. Deeming

Appellate Court of Illinois

Schultz v. Deeming

194 Ill. App. 513, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 539

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 5, 1915·No. Gen. No. 20,632·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Guaranty, § 34*—when evidence insufficient to establish. In an action to recover for goods supplied to a third person, under an agreement which the statement of claim describes both as a sale and as a guaranty that such third person would pay for the goods, evidence held to show a sale to defendant, and not a guaranty. 4. Saxes, § 329*—when evidence sufficient to show. In an action to recover for goods supplied to a third person by direction of defendant, which contract defendant denied that he made, held that a finding for plaintiff was properly made on the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Guaranty, § 34*—when evidence insufficient to establish. In an action to recover for goods supplied to a third person, under an agreement which the statement of claim describes both as a sale and as a guaranty that such third person would pay for the goods, evidence held to show a sale to defendant, and not a guaranty. 4. Saxes, § 329*—when evidence sufficient to show. In an action to recover for goods supplied to a third person by direction of defendant, which contract defendant denied that he made, held that a finding for plaintiff was properly made on the evidence.

Schultz v. Deeming, 194 Ill. App. 513, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 539 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

194 Ill. App. 513 (Schultz v. Deeming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.