Schultz v. Deeming

Appellate Court of Illinois

Schultz v. Deeming

194 Ill. App. 513, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 539

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 5, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,632

StatusPublished

This text of 194 Ill. App. 513 (Schultz v. Deeming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schultz v. Deeming, 194 Ill. App. 513, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 539 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Guaranty, § 34*—when evidence insufficient to establish. In an action to recover for goods supplied to a third person, under an agreement which the statement of claim describes both as a sale and as a guaranty that such third person would pay for the goods, evidence held to show a sale to defendant, and not a guaranty. 4. Saxes, § 329*—when evidence sufficient to show. In an action to recover for goods supplied to a third person by direction of defendant, which contract defendant denied that he made, held that a finding for plaintiff was properly made on the evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Guaranty, § 34*—when evidence insufficient to establish. In an action to recover for goods supplied to a third person, under an agreement which the statement of claim describes both as a sale and as a guaranty that such third person would pay for the goods, evidence held to show a sale to defendant, and not a guaranty. 4. Saxes, § 329*—when evidence sufficient to show. In an action to recover for goods supplied to a third person by direction of defendant, which contract defendant denied that he made, held that a finding for plaintiff was properly made on the evidence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 Ill. App. 513, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-v-deeming-illappct-1915.