Schultz v. DeClusin
This text of 2022 ND 75 (Schultz v. DeClusin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT APRIL 14, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 75
Tiffany Schultz, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Zachary DeClusin, Defendant and Appellee
No. 20210315
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Susan L. Bailey, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Theresa L. Kellington, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellant.
Leah R. Carlson, West Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellee. Schultz v. DeClusin No. 20210315
[¶1] Tiffany Schultz appeals from an amended judgment awarding primary residential responsibility of their child to Zachary DeClusin. She also appeals from a money judgment awarding DeClusin $17,159.63 in attorney’s fees and costs. Schultz claims the district court clearly erred in awarding DeClusin primary residential responsibility, and the court abused its discretion by awarding DeClusin attorney’s fees and costs. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 ND 75, 973 N.W.2d 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-v-declusin-nd-2022.