Schultz v. De Hart

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Schultz v. De Hart

153 N.Y.S. 939

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 153 N.Y.S. 939 (Schultz v. De Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schultz v. De Hart, 153 N.Y.S. 939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

GUY, J.

The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate an order which directed that an execution issue out of the Municipal Court against the earnings, wages, and salary of the defendant.

[1] The plaintiff moves for an order dismissing the appeal, upon the ground that the order is not appealable. The notice of motion is not accompanied by any affidavit. Consequently the notice is not based upon any statement of facts to enable the court to determine the motion without resort to the record, and the motion must therefore be dismissed.

[2] An examination of the record discloses that the order is not appealable, and therefore the appeal must be dismissed.

Motion and appeal dismissed, without costs to either party. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GUY, J.

The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate an order which directed that an execution issue out of the Municipal Court against the earnings, wages, and salary of the defendant.

[1] The plaintiff moves for an order dismissing the appeal, upon the ground that the order is not appealable. The notice of motion is not accompanied by any affidavit. Consequently the notice is not based upon any statement of facts to enable the court to determine the motion without resort to the record, and the motion must therefore be dismissed.

[2] An examination of the record discloses that the order is not appealable, and therefore the appeal must be dismissed.

Motion and appeal dismissed, without costs to either party. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 N.Y.S. 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-v-de-hart-nyappterm-1915.