Schultz v. Cox Operating, LLC

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Schultz v. Cox Operating, LLC

243 So. 3d 546

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 25, 2018

DocketNO. 2018–C–0397

StatusPublished

This text of 243 So. 3d 546 (Schultz v. Cox Operating, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schultz v. Cox Operating, LLC, 243 So. 3d 546 (La. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.

Respectfully, I would grant the writ and provide some relief to counsel for Greene's Energy Group, LLC. He is criticized for failing to respond to emails that were sent to the wrong address (gtbs.com rather than gjtbs.com). This discrepancy is not contested. The court of appeal should have granted rehearing to amend its opinion in order to delete any implication that counsel for Greene's "failed to cooperate."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.

Respectfully, I would grant the writ and provide some relief to counsel for Greene's Energy Group, LLC. He is criticized for failing to respond to emails that were sent to the wrong address (gtbs.com rather than gjtbs.com). This discrepancy is not contested. The court of appeal should have granted rehearing to amend its opinion in order to delete any implication that counsel for Greene's "failed to cooperate."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 So. 3d 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-v-cox-operating-llc-la-2018.