Schultz v. Cox Operating, LLC

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Schultz v. Cox Operating, LLC

243 So. 3d 546

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 25, 2018·No. NO. 2018–C–0397·Published

Opinion

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.

Respectfully, I would grant the writ and provide some relief to counsel for Greene's Energy Group, LLC. He is criticized for failing to respond to emails that were sent to the wrong address (gtbs.com rather than gjtbs.com). This discrepancy is not contested. The court of appeal should have granted rehearing to amend its opinion in order to delete any implication that counsel for Greene's "failed to cooperate."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hughes, J., would grant the writ.

Respectfully, I would grant the writ and provide some relief to counsel for Greene's Energy Group, LLC. He is criticized for failing to respond to emails that were sent to the wrong address (gtbs.com rather than gjtbs.com). This discrepancy is not contested. The court of appeal should have granted rehearing to amend its opinion in order to delete any implication that counsel for Greene's "failed to cooperate."

Schultz v. Cox Operating, LLC, 243 So. 3d 546 (La. 2018).

Pincite

243 So. 3d 546 (Schultz v. Cox Operating, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.