Schultz v. . Bradley

New York Court of Appeals

Schultz v. . Bradley

57 N.Y. 646

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 5, 1874

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 N.Y. 646 (Schultz v. . Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schultz v. . Bradley, 57 N.Y. 646 (N.Y. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Reynolds, C.,

reads for reversal and new trial; Lott, Ch. C., and Gray, C., concur.

Earl, C.,

reads for affirmance; Johnson, C., concurs.

Lott, Ch. C.,

for reversal, on ground that the written contract could not be enlarged by an oral agreement, and that there was no acceptance of leather under the oral agreements. Judgment reversed; Earl and Johnson, CC., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds, C.,

reads for reversal and new trial; Lott, Ch. C., and Gray, C., concur.

Earl, C.,

reads for affirmance; Johnson, C., concurs.

Lott, Ch. C.,

for reversal, on ground that the written contract could not be enlarged by an oral agreement, and that there was no acceptance of leather under the oral agreements. Judgment reversed; Earl and Johnson, CC., dissenting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 N.Y. 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-v-bradley-ny-1874.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack