Schultz v. Bear Creek Refining Co.
34 A. 560, 174 Pa. 287, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 878
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 9, 1896
DocketAppeal, No. 157
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 34 A. 560 (Schultz v. Bear Creek Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schultz v. Bear Creek Refining Co., 34 A. 560, 174 Pa. 287, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 878 (Pa. 1896).
Opinion
We are not aware of any statute that gives a right of appeal from an order refusing to strike off an appeal from arbitrators. None has been brought to our attention. The order is interlocutory. The cause is still pending and may be brought to trial at the will of either party. For this reason the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Caples v. Klugman
198 A.2d 342 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)
Sheafer v. Melcher
48 Pa. Super. 398 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Drum v. Uplinger
9 Pa. Super. 404 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
34 A. 560, 174 Pa. 287, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-v-bear-creek-refining-co-pa-1896.