Schultz v. Bear Creek Refining Co.

34 A. 560, 174 Pa. 287, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 878
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 9, 1896·No. Appeal, No. 157·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are not aware of any statute that gives a right of appeal from an order refusing to strike off an appeal from arbitrators. None has been brought to our attention. The order is interlocutory. The cause is still pending and may be brought to trial at the will of either party. For this reason the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schultz v. Bear Creek Refining Co., 34 A. 560, 174 Pa. 287, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 878 (Pa. 1896).

34 A. 560 (Schultz v. Bear Creek Refining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caples v. Klugman
198 A.2d 342 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)
Sheafer v. Melcher
48 Pa. Super. 398 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)
Drum v. Uplinger
9 Pa. Super. 404 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)