Schultz v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.
137 A.D. 895
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Queens county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and .motion to dismiss complaint for failure to prosecute granted, with costs, on the authority of Regan v. Milliken Bros. (123 App. Div. 72). Hirschberg, P. J., Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred, Woodward and Thomas, JJ., dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schultz v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., 137 A.D. 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).
137 A.D. 895 (Schultz v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Regan v. Milliken Bros.
123 A.D. 72 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)