Schultz v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.
121 N.Y.S. 1147
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 1910
StatusPublished
This text of 121 N.Y.S. 1147 (Schultz v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schultz v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co., 121 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Queens County reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss complaint for failure to prosecute granted, with costs, on the authority of Regan v. Milliken Bros., 123 App. Div. 72, 107 N. Y. Supp. 722. See, also, 127 App. Div. 305, 111 N. Y. Supp. 281.
WOODWARD and THOMAS, JJ., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Regan v. Milliken Bros.
123 A.D. 72 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Schultz v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.
127 A.D. 305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
121 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-v-barber-asphalt-paving-co-nyappdiv-1910.