Schultz Surgical Instrument Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Schultz Surgical Instrument Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 436

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 25, 1957

DocketNo. 61217; protest 296200-K (New York)

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 436 (Schultz Surgical Instrument Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schultz Surgical Instrument Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 436 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of John P. Herber & Co., Inc. v. United States (30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of John P. Herber & Co., Inc. v. United States (30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 Cust. Ct. 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-surgical-instrument-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack