Schultz & Son, Inc. v. Nelson
This text of 230 A.D. 792 (Schultz & Son, Inc. v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Young, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal upon the ground that appellant owed the purchaser no duty out of which the purchaser is entitled to damages. To the claim that appellant agreed to convey if the time of the closing of title were adjourned, the Statute of Frauds is a good defense.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schultz-son-inc-v-nelson-nyappdiv-1930.